How to Win an Election From Jail
January 13, 2022
Joel Castón was incarcerated when he was 18 years old. He’s now 45 and in November of last year, just two months ago, Joel was released after serving over 26 years. While incarcerated, he received a degree through the Georgetown Prison Scholars Program and started a mentorship initiative called Young Men Emerging. And, because D.C. changed the law to allow incarcerated people to vote, he ran for office, and he won: he is now an Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner in Washington D.C. representing the 7th Ward including the jail that he just walked out of. He’s the first incarcerated person in D.C. history to win elected office. Joel joins us today to talk about his experience, what he’s focusing on as a newly elected commissioner in D.C., and how he’s changing the public narrative about incarcerated people.
In this episode
This Episode Covers the Following Issues
-
Access to the Courts and Counsel
-
Alternatives to Incarceration
-
Alternatives to Youth Incarceration
-
Civil Liberties
-
Civil Liberties in Prison
-
Criminal Law Reform
-
Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions
-
Discrimination
-
Free Speech in Prison
-
Human Rights
-
Human Rights and Criminal Justice
-
Juvenile Justice
-
Parole and Release
-
Prisoners' Rights
-
Race and Criminal Justice
-
Race and Economic Justice
-
Racial Justice
-
Sentencing Reform
-
Smart Justice
-
Youth Incarceration
Related Content
-
News & CommentaryOct 2025
Racial Justice
Civil Liberties
Trump's Attempt To Roll Back Key Civil Rights-enforcement Tool. Explore News & Commentary.Trump's Attempt to Roll Back Key Civil Rights-Enforcement Tool
By rolling back “disparate impact” rules, the administration threatens decades of progress against systemic discrimination in housing, jobs, and education.By: Sarah Hinger, Ricardo Mimbela, Linda Morris -
News & CommentaryOct 2025
Civil Liberties
Seven Million People Unite At Peaceful No Kings Protests To Defend Our First Amendment Rights. Explore News & Commentary.Seven Million People Unite at Peaceful No Kings Protests to Defend Our First Amendment Rights
ACLU Justice Division leader Ellen Flenniken saw people across the country come together to stand up for free speech, protest peacefully, and show that our power grows when we act as one.By: Ellen Flenniken -
Press ReleaseOct 2025
Free Speech
Civil Liberties
Over Seven Million People Exercise Their First Amendment Rights In Nationwide No Kings Protests. Explore Press Release.Over Seven Million People Exercise their First Amendment Rights in Nationwide No Kings Protests
WASHINGTON — Over seven million people across the country peacefully and lawfully gathered today to express their First Amendment rights at more than 2,700 events across all 50 states and send a clear message to the Trump administration: The American people will not accept attempts to undermine our democracy and take away our freedoms. In reaction to the historic protests, Deirdre Schifeling, Chief Political and Advocacy Officer for the American Civil Liberties Union, issued the following statement: “Today, millions of people showed that we, the people, will not be silenced. We came together in community to do the most patriotic and American thing we can: exercising our First Amendment rights by peacefully and lawfully protesting President Trump’s abuses of power. We’ll continue to channel the courage of these protests to keep showing up for our communities — and the ACLU will do everything in our power to defend our freedom of speech, press, and assembly. Despite the Trump administration’s threats, no president can take this cornerstone of our democracy away from us.” -
Utah Supreme CourtOct 2025
Civil Liberties
State V. Uptain. Explore Case.State v. Uptain
This case asks whether the trial record, without more, demonstrates that a defendant’s constitutional right to adequate legal representation has been violated, where the record reveals that the defendant’s attorney never sought to suppress the only incriminating evidence that the State had against them. The ACLU’s SSCI and the ACLU of Utah filed an amicus brief arguing that the defendant's trial counsel in this case was indeed ineffective and that holding otherwise would undermine the right to effective assistance of counsel.Status: Ongoing